• عربي
  • Fr
  • Es
No Result
View All Result
European Eye on Radicalization
  • Home
  • About Us
    • Who We Are
      • Editorial board and staff
      • Contributors
    • Vision
  • Analysis
  • Opinion Pieces
    • EER Editorials
    • Contributors’ Opinions
  • Reports
  • Reading Radicalization
  • Events
    • EER Events
    • Events EER attends
  • Interviews
  • Videos
  • Contact
  • Home
  • About Us
    • Who We Are
      • Editorial board and staff
      • Contributors
    • Vision
  • Analysis
  • Opinion Pieces
    • EER Editorials
    • Contributors’ Opinions
  • Reports
  • Reading Radicalization
  • Events
    • EER Events
    • Events EER attends
  • Interviews
  • Videos
  • Contact
No Result
View All Result
European Eye on Radicalization
No Result
View All Result
Home Opinion Pieces Contributors’ Opinions

Mental Illness vs. Terrorism: The Danforth Attack

31 July 2018
in Contributors’ Opinions, Opinion Pieces
86
VIEWS
Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

Hicham Tiflati 

On July 22, Faisal Hussain, a 29-year-old man, opened fire in the Greektown neighborhood in Toronto, leaving 18-year-old Reese Fallon and 10-year-old Julianna Kozis dead. Thirteen other people, aged 17 to 59, were wounded.

Researchers, analysts, investigators, and experts are still digging into his life trying to understand the motives behind his act.

His family and relatives indicated that he suffered from depression, psychosis, and “severe mental health challenges”. They said medications did not help and the interventions of professionals were unsuccessful.

Faisal Hussein was also known to police for having a history of mental health issues dating back to 2010. He was involuntarily held in a psychiatric facility in Toronto when he was under 18.

Hussain’s prior contact with the authorities was exclusively related to his mental health problems. He had no criminal record before the attack and was not on the radar of national security agencies. In 2009 and 2010, Hussain privately told two teachers that he wanted to kill someone, and then he cut his forehead with a pencil sharpener blade. Once the news reached the police, he was apprehended under the Mental Health Act, but was later released because professionals assumed there wasn’t an immediate risk at the time.

A neighbor described him as “a paranoid man with peculiar habits. He dressed inappropriately in heavy clothes even in summer, always carrying a backpack. He didn’t take transit or ride in a car. He did not have a license and walked everywhere.” The neighbor said Hussein “was not at all religious, declining to participate even in Friday prayers.”

It was not clear whether Hussain killed himself or was killed by the authorities during the attack. But after conducting an autopsy on his body, the police said his gunshot wound was self-inflicted.

48 hours after the attack, ISIS, via its AMAQ news agency, took credit for the attack. The posting, shown below, was vague and simply stated the attacker “was a soldier of the Islamic State and carried out the attack in response to calls to target the citizens of the coalition countries”. The terrorist group offered no proof of a direct link to support its claim.

Translation: “The person who carried out the Toronto city attack in south-east Canada on Sunday evening is one of the soldiers of the Islamic State and he carried out the attack in response to calls for targeting citizens of the coalition countries”.

At present, there is still no sign that Hussain was actually inspired or directed by ISIS to carry out the attack. The claim published by ISIS’s media arm did not provide any evidence. Nor did Toronto police find any hard evidence to support ISIS’s claim. “At this stage, we have no evidence to support these claims,” said Toronto police Chief Mark Saunders. A Public Safety spokesman also said “there is no national security nexus to the shooter.” The RCMP too said they have seen no national security element.

Nonetheless, many journalists and politicians are obsessed with trying to prove an ISIS link to the shooting. They claim that, by trying to uncover the truth and deliver real news to their audiences, they’re being true to their profession and avoiding political correctness. Once ISIS took credit for the attack, many of these media outlets switched to the “we told you” mode.

New details that support ISIS’s claim of responsibility may surface later. However, ISIS claims aren’t what they once were. ISIS used to provide evidence for its attack claims, such as a statement of. allegiance from a perpetrator. In recent times, though, they have made more and more claims of responsibility for attacks on foreign soil without any hard evidence. Is it a change of strategy or just an empty thirst for attention and media coverage?

In fact, questions were immediately raised about the validity of ISIS claims. In this context, let’s remember last year’s Las Vegas shooting by Stephen Paddock, which left 58 people dead and 851 injured. It too was also claimed by ISIS, using the same terminology: “the gunman was a soldier of the Islamic State”. However, the FBI found no evidence of a link to international terrorism and the Las Vegas Sheriff labeled the perpetrator a “local individual” and a “lone wolf.”

It seems that, again and again, the “terrorism” label is often only applied in cases where the perpetrator is Muslim. And those cases also receive significantly more news coverage. Attacks committed by Muslims receive almost 400% more press attention, one study finds. They garner an average of 105 headlines, compared to just 15 for attacks by others.

For instance, in Canada, Martin Couture-Rouleau, who rammed his car into two soldiers, killing one, and Michael Zehaf-Bibeau, who killed a soldier, were not presented just as two local criminals or “lone wolves,” despite being assessed with chronic psychological problems. They were immediately labeled terrorists and their crimes were attributed to their Islamic faith.

Meanwhile Justin Bourque, who attacked five RCMP officers and killed three, is simply a murderer. The fact that Bourque grew up in a “religious fanatic” environment and believed he was “a soldier of Jesus Christ” did not make a difference. His crime was never linked to terrorism. Similarly, Alexandre Bissonnette, the Quebec mosque shooter, has been seen as “disturbed,” mentally deranged, “sick,” and “demented”.

This Toronto shooting is also reviving the debate about gun safety and legislation in Canada. A CP24 safety specialist says a police source has told him the handgun used by Hussein is originally from the United States because it is illegal in Canada. According to the Toronto police, half of the guns used for criminal activity were smuggled into Canada from the United States, but the other half were first bought here legally.

First things first, we don’t have the full picture yet and we should not rush to conclusions. Hussain’s surroundings were a mishmash of drugs, gang-related activities, and a lifelong struggle with depression and psychosis. One of his long-time friends was released on bail after being accused in the largest seizure of carfentanyl in Canadian history – along with 33 firearms and ammunition – in his Pickering rental property. His sister was killed in a car accident. And his brother, who is still in a coma from a drug overdose, was also charged for selling cocaine.

European Eye on Radicalization aims to publish a diversity of perspectives and as such does not endorse the opinions expressed by contributors. The views expressed in this article represent the author alone.

Related Posts

The Escalating Israeli-Palestinian Conflict
EER Editorials

The Escalating Israeli-Palestinian Conflict

30 January 2023
Spotlight on Contemporary Antisemitism
Contributors’ Opinions

Spotlight on Contemporary Antisemitism

27 January 2023
Preventing and Countering Right-Wing Extremism: Current and Upcoming Challenges
Contributors’ Opinions

Preventing and Countering Right-Wing Extremism: Current and Upcoming Challenges

26 January 2023
Sweden’s Free Speech Debate and the Growing Far-Right Movement
EER Editorials

Sweden’s Free Speech Debate and the Growing Far-Right Movement

24 January 2023
The Taliban’s Repression of Women is Not Only a Problem for Afghanistan
EER Editorials

The Taliban’s Repression of Women is Not Only a Problem for Afghanistan

17 January 2023
The Islamic State and the Question of “Lone Wolves”
EER Editorials

The Islamic State and the Question of “Lone Wolves”

9 January 2023

Latest from Twitter

Popular

The Challenges of Combatting Extremist Financing in Germany

The Challenges of Combatting Extremist Financing in Germany

6 January 2023
The Myth of the Remote-Controlled Car Bomb

The Myth of the Remote-Controlled Car Bomb

16 September 2019
How a Swedish Agency Stopped Funding the Muslim Brotherhood

How a Swedish Agency Stopped Funding the Muslim Brotherhood

5 September 2022

Taliban: Structure, Strategy, Agenda, and the International Terrorism Threat

7 October 2022
The Role of Online Communities in the Expansion of Far-Right Extremism

The Role of Online Communities in the Expansion of Far-Right Extremism

3 November 2022
Becoming Ansar Allah: How the Islamic Revolution Conquered Yemen

Becoming Ansar Allah: How the Islamic Revolution Conquered Yemen

24 March 2021

© 2018 EER - Copyright © European Eye on Radicalization.

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • About Us
    • Who We Are
      • Editorial board and staff
      • Contributors
    • Vision
  • Analysis
  • Opinion Pieces
    • EER Editorials
    • Contributors’ Opinions
  • Reports
  • Reading Radicalization
  • Events
    • EER Events
    • Events EER attends
  • Interviews
  • Videos
  • Contact
  • عربي
  • Fr
  • Es

© 2018 EER - Copyright © European Eye on Radicalization.

This website uses cookies. By continuing to use this website you are giving consent to cookies being used. Visit our Privacy and Cookie Policy.