• عربي
  • Fr
  • Es
No Result
View All Result
European Eye on Radicalization
  • Home
  • About Us
    • Who We Are
      • Editorial board and staff
      • Contributors
    • Vision
  • Analysis
  • Opinion Pieces
    • EER Editorials
    • Contributors’ Opinions
  • Reports
  • Reading Radicalization
  • Events
    • EER Events
    • Events EER attends
  • Interviews
  • Videos
  • Contact
  • Home
  • About Us
    • Who We Are
      • Editorial board and staff
      • Contributors
    • Vision
  • Analysis
  • Opinion Pieces
    • EER Editorials
    • Contributors’ Opinions
  • Reports
  • Reading Radicalization
  • Events
    • EER Events
    • Events EER attends
  • Interviews
  • Videos
  • Contact
No Result
View All Result
European Eye on Radicalization
No Result
View All Result
Home Opinion Pieces EER Editorials

Implications of the Spreading Violence in the United States

30 May 2020
in EER Editorials, Opinion Pieces
Implications of the Spreading Violence in the United States
346
VIEWS
Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

European Eye on Radicalization

 

George Floyd, an African-American man, was killed by a policeman on May 25 in Minneapolis, Minnesota. The police department initially lied and claimed Floyd was resisting arrest; video footage swiftly emerged that falsified this. Protests erupted against police brutality and were soon overtaken by lawless elements who burned property and looted shops. The rioting has since spread to other cities in the United States. Bringing together a powderkeg of issues around legal equality, racial justice, and social order, the fallout from the killing of Floyd and the subsequent disorders show signs of providing opportunities to political extremists and could be an important factor in the American Election in November.

The Initial Event

The video of Floyd’s killing that has spread far and wide on social media shows that, so far from Floyd resisting arrest, Floyd had been subdued at the time he was killed. Policeman Derek Chauvin knelt on his neck for nearly nine minutes—in front of a crowd, many of whom objected vociferously during the event. “You don’t have to sit there with your knee on his neck”, said one onlooker in the video. “You could have put him in the car by now”. This summarized the view of most who viewed the video.

As it transpired, Chauvin had a history of complaints—at least seventeen—against him for improper conduct, nearly one per year during his time in the police force, and in only one case had he been reprimanded. This apparent impunity, and the fact Chauvin was white, has given racialized overtones to the entire episode and the subsequent disorders.

For some, the Floyd case will be redolent of the Ferguson events in 2014, albeit that the narrative the protesters believed was false, or perhaps more exactly the case of Eric Garner around the same time, a black man who died while in a police choke-hold in New York City, like Floyd on video, while saying repeatedly, “I can’t breathe”. Floyd’s killing also comes just a few months after the February 23 killing of another black man, Ahmaud Arbery, in Atlanta, this time not by the police. The Arbery killing did have in common with Floyd’s, though, that it was at first claimed that Arbery had been killed during wrongdoing—suspected burglary—but a video showed that he had been gunned down without provocation in the street while jogging.

While these prior incidents have more in common in a political-sociological sense with what has happened in Minneapolis, in a purely mechanistic sense the spread of the violence after a localized incident might be analogized to the rioting in Britain in the summer of 2011, which followed the police shooting of Mark Duggan, a violent gangster in Tottenham.

Subsequent Events

Chauvin was dismissed from his job and charged with murder on May 29. Unfortunately, by then events had already gotten out of control. The night of May 28 saw violence so extensive in Minneapolis that the National Guard had to be called out—although they were not able to enter the city immediately for various logistical reasons. A Target store was ransacked and looted. The police station that Chauvin supposedly worked at was overrun and then torched. The scenes on the morning of May 29 were “post-apocalyptic”, and tensions continued to rise after a CNN news crew were arrested.

None of this was helped when President Donald Trump tweeted in the evening of May 29 that “THUGS” were rampaging in Minneapolis, a word some thought was a racial dog-whistle, before adding, “when the looting starts, the shooting starts. Thank you!”

The day before, Trump had signed an Executive Order that would ostensibly regulate Twitter and other social media platforms so as to ensure political neutrality, the latest flash-point in a long-running politico-legal argument about the status of these platforms. When Twitter subsequently censored the Trump tweet about shooting looters, this only deepened the culture war colouring of events and thus the political polarization, with conservatives believing this was proof the social media giant is biased against them—something independent research suggests is true—while liberals saw it as vindication of their claim that Trump is a racist.

Overnight May 29/30, the rioting spread to Portland, Los Angeles, New York, Dallas, Atlanta, and many other cities.

Trump is far from the only political figure to try to capitalize on the situation. Reverend Al Sharpton, an infamous racial provocateur, has journeyed to Minneapolis to take advantage. Some locals have taken the initiative of forming de facto militias to protect property; it is easy to see this providing an opening to white far-Right forces that are already organised into armed formations. The accelerationist coalition, those various fringe elements who believe their project would be furthered by causing a collapse of the U.S. government, have been visible during these events, notably the Leftist extremists like ANTIFA. Even foreign extremists, like former Iranian president Mahmud Ahmadinejad, have joined in trying to inflame the situation.

Effects Going Forward

The outbreak of this mayhem during the coronavirus pandemic is probably not coincidental—it is a release after months of lockdown—but the collapse of the social distancing regulations might yet have knock-on repercussions in the form of a fresh outbreak of the virus. Many more deaths could be indirectly caused by this killing in Minneapolis.

Politically, there are two paths forward. One is that the Democrats are able to construct a narrative where this chaos is the result of Trump’s mismanagement of the country. The other path, which is much more likely based on the academic literature about civil rights protests, is that these events redound to Trump’s benefit as he amplifies a message of law-and-order and portrays Democrats as sympathetic to the hooliganism. Trump has expressed outrage at what happened to Floyd, simultaneous with taking a clear hardline against the violence and looting, a message that has broad resonance in America and is could peel away some Democratic voters in November.

Related Posts

The Escalating Israeli-Palestinian Conflict
EER Editorials

The Escalating Israeli-Palestinian Conflict

30 January 2023
Spotlight on Contemporary Antisemitism
Contributors’ Opinions

Spotlight on Contemporary Antisemitism

27 January 2023
Preventing and Countering Right-Wing Extremism: Current and Upcoming Challenges
Contributors’ Opinions

Preventing and Countering Right-Wing Extremism: Current and Upcoming Challenges

26 January 2023
Sweden’s Free Speech Debate and the Growing Far-Right Movement
EER Editorials

Sweden’s Free Speech Debate and the Growing Far-Right Movement

24 January 2023
The Taliban’s Repression of Women is Not Only a Problem for Afghanistan
EER Editorials

The Taliban’s Repression of Women is Not Only a Problem for Afghanistan

17 January 2023
The Islamic State and the Question of “Lone Wolves”
EER Editorials

The Islamic State and the Question of “Lone Wolves”

9 January 2023

Latest from Twitter

Popular

The Challenges of Combatting Extremist Financing in Germany

The Challenges of Combatting Extremist Financing in Germany

6 January 2023
The Myth of the Remote-Controlled Car Bomb

The Myth of the Remote-Controlled Car Bomb

16 September 2019

Taliban: Structure, Strategy, Agenda, and the International Terrorism Threat

7 October 2022
How a Swedish Agency Stopped Funding the Muslim Brotherhood

How a Swedish Agency Stopped Funding the Muslim Brotherhood

5 September 2022
Becoming Ansar Allah: How the Islamic Revolution Conquered Yemen

Becoming Ansar Allah: How the Islamic Revolution Conquered Yemen

24 March 2021
The Role of Online Communities in the Expansion of Far-Right Extremism

The Role of Online Communities in the Expansion of Far-Right Extremism

3 November 2022

© 2018 EER - Copyright © European Eye on Radicalization.

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • About Us
    • Who We Are
      • Editorial board and staff
      • Contributors
    • Vision
  • Analysis
  • Opinion Pieces
    • EER Editorials
    • Contributors’ Opinions
  • Reports
  • Reading Radicalization
  • Events
    • EER Events
    • Events EER attends
  • Interviews
  • Videos
  • Contact
  • عربي
  • Fr
  • Es

© 2018 EER - Copyright © European Eye on Radicalization.

This website uses cookies. By continuing to use this website you are giving consent to cookies being used. Visit our Privacy and Cookie Policy.