• عربي
  • Fr
  • Es
No Result
View All Result
European Eye on Radicalization
  • Home
  • About Us
    • Who We Are
      • Editorial board and staff
      • Contributors
    • Vision
  • Analysis
  • Opinion Pieces
    • EER Editorials
    • Contributors’ Opinions
  • Reports
  • Reading Radicalization
  • Events
    • EER Events
    • Events EER attends
  • Interviews
  • Videos
  • Contact
  • Home
  • About Us
    • Who We Are
      • Editorial board and staff
      • Contributors
    • Vision
  • Analysis
  • Opinion Pieces
    • EER Editorials
    • Contributors’ Opinions
  • Reports
  • Reading Radicalization
  • Events
    • EER Events
    • Events EER attends
  • Interviews
  • Videos
  • Contact
No Result
View All Result
European Eye on Radicalization
No Result
View All Result
Home Opinion Pieces EER Editorials

Implications of the Spreading Violence in the United States

30 May 2020
in EER Editorials, Opinion Pieces
Implications of the Spreading Violence in the United States
357
VIEWS
Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

European Eye on Radicalization

 

George Floyd, an African-American man, was killed by a policeman on May 25 in Minneapolis, Minnesota. The police department initially lied and claimed Floyd was resisting arrest; video footage swiftly emerged that falsified this. Protests erupted against police brutality and were soon overtaken by lawless elements who burned property and looted shops. The rioting has since spread to other cities in the United States. Bringing together a powderkeg of issues around legal equality, racial justice, and social order, the fallout from the killing of Floyd and the subsequent disorders show signs of providing opportunities to political extremists and could be an important factor in the American Election in November.

The Initial Event

The video of Floyd’s killing that has spread far and wide on social media shows that, so far from Floyd resisting arrest, Floyd had been subdued at the time he was killed. Policeman Derek Chauvin knelt on his neck for nearly nine minutes—in front of a crowd, many of whom objected vociferously during the event. “You don’t have to sit there with your knee on his neck”, said one onlooker in the video. “You could have put him in the car by now”. This summarized the view of most who viewed the video.

As it transpired, Chauvin had a history of complaints—at least seventeen—against him for improper conduct, nearly one per year during his time in the police force, and in only one case had he been reprimanded. This apparent impunity, and the fact Chauvin was white, has given racialized overtones to the entire episode and the subsequent disorders.

For some, the Floyd case will be redolent of the Ferguson events in 2014, albeit that the narrative the protesters believed was false, or perhaps more exactly the case of Eric Garner around the same time, a black man who died while in a police choke-hold in New York City, like Floyd on video, while saying repeatedly, “I can’t breathe”. Floyd’s killing also comes just a few months after the February 23 killing of another black man, Ahmaud Arbery, in Atlanta, this time not by the police. The Arbery killing did have in common with Floyd’s, though, that it was at first claimed that Arbery had been killed during wrongdoing—suspected burglary—but a video showed that he had been gunned down without provocation in the street while jogging.

While these prior incidents have more in common in a political-sociological sense with what has happened in Minneapolis, in a purely mechanistic sense the spread of the violence after a localized incident might be analogized to the rioting in Britain in the summer of 2011, which followed the police shooting of Mark Duggan, a violent gangster in Tottenham.

Subsequent Events

Chauvin was dismissed from his job and charged with murder on May 29. Unfortunately, by then events had already gotten out of control. The night of May 28 saw violence so extensive in Minneapolis that the National Guard had to be called out—although they were not able to enter the city immediately for various logistical reasons. A Target store was ransacked and looted. The police station that Chauvin supposedly worked at was overrun and then torched. The scenes on the morning of May 29 were “post-apocalyptic”, and tensions continued to rise after a CNN news crew were arrested.

None of this was helped when President Donald Trump tweeted in the evening of May 29 that “THUGS” were rampaging in Minneapolis, a word some thought was a racial dog-whistle, before adding, “when the looting starts, the shooting starts. Thank you!”

The day before, Trump had signed an Executive Order that would ostensibly regulate Twitter and other social media platforms so as to ensure political neutrality, the latest flash-point in a long-running politico-legal argument about the status of these platforms. When Twitter subsequently censored the Trump tweet about shooting looters, this only deepened the culture war colouring of events and thus the political polarization, with conservatives believing this was proof the social media giant is biased against them—something independent research suggests is true—while liberals saw it as vindication of their claim that Trump is a racist.

Overnight May 29/30, the rioting spread to Portland, Los Angeles, New York, Dallas, Atlanta, and many other cities.

Trump is far from the only political figure to try to capitalize on the situation. Reverend Al Sharpton, an infamous racial provocateur, has journeyed to Minneapolis to take advantage. Some locals have taken the initiative of forming de facto militias to protect property; it is easy to see this providing an opening to white far-Right forces that are already organised into armed formations. The accelerationist coalition, those various fringe elements who believe their project would be furthered by causing a collapse of the U.S. government, have been visible during these events, notably the Leftist extremists like ANTIFA. Even foreign extremists, like former Iranian president Mahmud Ahmadinejad, have joined in trying to inflame the situation.

Effects Going Forward

The outbreak of this mayhem during the coronavirus pandemic is probably not coincidental—it is a release after months of lockdown—but the collapse of the social distancing regulations might yet have knock-on repercussions in the form of a fresh outbreak of the virus. Many more deaths could be indirectly caused by this killing in Minneapolis.

Politically, there are two paths forward. One is that the Democrats are able to construct a narrative where this chaos is the result of Trump’s mismanagement of the country. The other path, which is much more likely based on the academic literature about civil rights protests, is that these events redound to Trump’s benefit as he amplifies a message of law-and-order and portrays Democrats as sympathetic to the hooliganism. Trump has expressed outrage at what happened to Floyd, simultaneous with taking a clear hardline against the violence and looting, a message that has broad resonance in America and is could peel away some Democratic voters in November.

Related Posts

Counterterrorism and Rising State Fragility in the Post-Coup Sahel Region
Contributors’ Opinions

Counterterrorism and Rising State Fragility in the Post-Coup Sahel Region

30 May 2023
Should the British Government Be Worried About Islamist Participationists?
Contributors’ Opinions

Should the British Government Be Worried About Islamist Participationists?

29 May 2023
The Role of MHPSS Efforts in the Prevention of Violent Extremism in Africa
Contributors’ Opinions

The Role of MHPSS Efforts in the Prevention of Violent Extremism in Africa

25 May 2023
The Terrorist Threat in the Gulf of Guinea
Contributors’ Opinions

The Terrorist Threat in the Gulf of Guinea

23 May 2023
Is CVE in the West Heading Down the Wrong Road?
Contributors’ Opinions

Is CVE in the West Heading Down the Wrong Road?

11 May 2023
How Long Before Other Extremists Pick Up This Neo-Nazi Media Innovation?
Contributors’ Opinions

How Long Before Other Extremists Pick Up This Neo-Nazi Media Innovation?

9 May 2023

Latest from Twitter

Popular

Hizb ut-Tahrir and Al-Muhajiroun: An Analysis of Extremist Islamist Groups and Their Relationships With Violence

Hizb ut-Tahrir and Al-Muhajiroun: An Analysis of Extremist Islamist Groups and Their Relationships With Violence

19 May 2023
Is Al-Qaeda Capable of Global Terrorism Any More?

Is Al-Qaeda Capable of Global Terrorism Any More?

23 February 2023
Becoming Ansar Allah: How the Islamic Revolution Conquered Yemen

Becoming Ansar Allah: How the Islamic Revolution Conquered Yemen

24 March 2021
Islamist Extremism and Jihadism in Latin America: A Longstanding and Underestimated Phenomenon (Part 1)

Islamist Extremism and Jihadism in Latin America: A Longstanding and Underestimated Phenomenon (Part 1)

14 April 2022
Afghanistan Under the Taliban: The Global Jihadist Threat to Europe and the Middle East

Afghanistan Under the Taliban: The Global Jihadist Threat to Europe and the Middle East

31 March 2023
A Study on the Status and Roles of Women in the Printed Jihadi Media

A Study on the Status and Roles of Women in the Printed Jihadi Media

25 April 2023

© 2018 EER - Copyright © European Eye on Radicalization.

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • About Us
    • Who We Are
      • Editorial board and staff
      • Contributors
    • Vision
  • Analysis
  • Opinion Pieces
    • EER Editorials
    • Contributors’ Opinions
  • Reports
  • Reading Radicalization
  • Events
    • EER Events
    • Events EER attends
  • Interviews
  • Videos
  • Contact
  • عربي
  • Fr
  • Es

© 2018 EER - Copyright © European Eye on Radicalization.

This website uses cookies. By continuing to use this website you are giving consent to cookies being used. Visit our Privacy and Cookie Policy.