• عربي
  • Fr
  • Es
No Result
View All Result
European Eye on Radicalization
  • Home
  • About Us
    • Who We Are
      • Editorial board and staff
      • Contributors
    • Vision
  • Articles
  • Reports
  • Reading Radicalization
  • Events
  • Videos
  • Glossary
  • Resources
    • Bibliographies
    • Journals
  • Contact
  • EnglishEnglish
    • العربيةالعربية
    • FrançaisFrançais
    • EspañolEspañol
  • Home
  • About Us
    • Who We Are
      • Editorial board and staff
      • Contributors
    • Vision
  • Articles
  • Reports
  • Reading Radicalization
  • Events
  • Videos
  • Glossary
  • Resources
    • Bibliographies
    • Journals
  • Contact
  • EnglishEnglish
    • العربيةالعربية
    • FrançaisFrançais
    • EspañolEspañol
No Result
View All Result
European Eye on Radicalization
No Result
View All Result
Home Events

Counter-Extremism: Challenges and Opportunities

2 December 2019
in Events
Counter-Extremism: Challenges and Opportunities
816
VIEWS
Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

European Eye on Radicalization

In The Hague on 28 November, European Eye on Radicalization (EER) held an event in partnership with LINKS Europe, an organization founded to support peace and conflict resolution, particularly by facilitating dialogue. It was fitting that the conference took place in The Hague, an open, welcoming city devoted to peace. And the urgency of EER and LINKS having brought together several-dozen experts to discuss issues around radicalization—including the effect of conflict and the potential for building bridges between East and West in countering radicalism—was underlined by the attack in The Hague, and the terrorist incident in London, at the end of last week.

There were a number of themes that emerged at the conference, some providing insights to old problems and others providing a basis for further study.

The role of Islam in radicalization is perhaps the most publicly discussed and controversial issue. Some argue that Islam is the root of the crisis. While increased overt religiosity and adoption of such symbols can be indicators of a radicalization path beginning, just as often Islam can provide resilience against radicalization.

In Europe, an important issue at present—and likely to get bigger in the future—is the rise of the far-Right, an extremist movement whose violent offshoots are increasing in number. The relationship between Islamist extremism and the far-Right is symbiotic: the existence of the threat from each ratifies the narratives of the other and provides recruitment opportunities with vulnerable communities. There is also an overlap and borrowing of tactics and ideological approaches. The blend of traditionalism and revolution found in the work of Fascist leader Benito Mussolini is echoed by the Muslim Brotherhood’s Sayyid Qutb.

While there has been significant coverage of the European far-Right, however, the European far-Left is an extremist movement that has received much less attention. Yet the far-Left has made a direct tactical—and even ideological—alliance with the Islamists. Human values around the individual have been shed in favour of communitarianism and identity politics. A notable example is Britain, where the leader of the main opposition party, Jeremy Corbyn, emerges out of this milieu. This synthesis of the regressive Left and Islamism, whether represented by the Brotherhood or the “harder” forces like Tablighi Jamaat, and the lack of seriousness from the liberal mainstream in dealing with this unholy alliance, is enabling the far-Right to present itself as the only guardian for native populations.

In Europe, these cultural conflicts provide the seedbed for extremist movements. In the Middle East, it is actual warfare that enables the extremists to infiltrate and expand among communities and even whole populations. Syria is the clearest case, where an uprising against tyranny was allowed to descend into a sectarian war where Al-Qaeda and the Islamic State (ISIS) could position themselves as vanguards for a Sunni population under assault. Other states such as Nigeria have similar dynamics at work. The “Arab spring” had seemed to hail the end of the jihadist movement, providing the peoples of the Middle East with alternative routes to change. In the decade since, the savagery of the counter-revolutionary movement has convinced many that violence is the only way to change—and it is the jihadists who offer themselves as the conduit for this rage.

Many Westerners believe—in various ways—that the jihadist threat and the terrorism against them is their fault. The problem is that this does not stack up with the facts. Of the four jihadi mobilizations in the West—Afghanistan in the 1980s, Bosnia in the 1990s, Iraq in the 2000s, and Syria in the 2010s—only one could plausibly be attributed to Western action, Iraq, and it was far from the most significant of these.

The data on the jihadi mobilizations in Europe also tells a different story than many people believe: marginalization of immigrants and minority populations is a constant, but even within countries there are only specific hotspots where Muslims are moved to join jihadi groups. The difference is the presence of recruiters and charismatic leaders. It is for this reason that states like Italy with more hardline policies on deporting radicals do not produce the backlash that some might expect. Instead, the removal of key influencers suppresses jihadi activity.

In working to counter violent extremism (CVE) and prevent violent extremism (PVE), it is difficult to accomplish if it is approached solely on those terms. Put simply, the conditions that lead to violent extremism have to be addressed, and this means caring about the grievances of those who are susceptible to the extremists’ message. If such people are approached through the CVE/PVE lens alone, they will be unresponsive. This raises difficult issues about both the nature and branding of CVE/PVE work, namely whether the scope of such action should be expanded or limited and how this should be presented.

The states of the Middle East have been experimenting with various answers to this conundrum, from post-revolutionary Tunisia to the more settled governments on the Gulf. All have found that security tools alone will not work; the ideology behind the terrorism has to be attacked, too. Alongside this, the Gulf states in particular have been attempting to promote an alternative, moderate discourse that can intellectually blunt the appeal of the radicals. Such counter-narratives require a carefully-tailored strategic communications approach.

Going forward, the ways in which a moderate discourse can be fostered and brought to the target audience will be one of the most important counter-extremism challenges.

Related Posts

EER Webinar: Political Islam and Radicalization in Austria
Events

EER Webinar: Political Islam and Radicalization in Austria

27 November 2020
EER Webinar: Hezbollah’s Role in a Changed Middle East
Events

EER Webinar: Hezbollah’s Role in a Changed Middle East

11 November 2020
Assessing Hezbollah in a Changed Middle East
Events

Assessing Hezbollah in a Changed Middle East

30 October 2020
How Extremists Are Adapting to the Coronavirus Crisis
Events

How Extremists Are Adapting to the Coronavirus Crisis

1 May 2020
Jihadist Competition and Cooperation in West Africa
Events

Jihadist Competition and Cooperation in West Africa

3 April 2020
The Challenge of Non-State Actors in the Modern World
Events

The Challenge of Non-State Actors in the Modern World

17 February 2020

Latest from Twitter

Popular

Muslim No-Go-Zones in the West – A Myth or a Reality?

24 July 2018
Death and Consequences for Al-Qaeda’s Leadership

Death and Consequences for Al-Qaeda’s Leadership

16 November 2020
Islamist Currents in the Maldives and the Islamic State

Islamist Currents in the Maldives and the Islamic State

10 February 2020
Terrorism in Switzerland: No Western Country is Immune to Jihadist Threat

Terrorism in Switzerland: No Western Country is Immune to Jihadist Threat

23 December 2020
Islamic State’s Khorasan Province: A Potent Force in Afghan Jihad

Islamic State’s Khorasan Province: A Potent Force in Afghan Jihad

14 December 2020
Counter-Radicalization and Female Empowerment Nexus: Can Female Empowerment Reduce the Appeal of Radical Ideologies?

Counter-Radicalization and Female Empowerment Nexus: Can Female Empowerment Reduce the Appeal of Radical Ideologies?

30 November 2020

© 2018 EER - Copyright © European Eye on Radicalization.

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • About Us
    • Who We Are
      • Editorial board and staff
      • Contributors
    • Vision
  • Articles
  • Reports
  • Reading Radicalization
  • Events
  • Videos
  • Glossary
  • Resources
    • Bibliographies
    • Journals
  • Contact
  • EnglishEnglish
    • العربيةالعربية
    • FrançaisFrançais
    • EspañolEspañol
  • عربي
  • Fr
  • Es

© 2018 EER - Copyright © European Eye on Radicalization.

This website uses cookies. By continuing to use this website you are giving consent to cookies being used. Visit our Privacy and Cookie Policy.