• عربي
  • Fr
  • Es
No Result
View All Result
European Eye on Radicalization
  • Home
  • About Us
    • Who We Are
      • Editorial board and staff
      • Contributors
    • Vision
  • Analysis
  • Opinion Pieces
    • EER Editorials
    • Contributors’ Opinions
  • Reports
  • Reading Radicalization
  • Events
    • EER Events
    • Events EER attends
  • Interviews
  • Videos
  • Contact
  • Home
  • About Us
    • Who We Are
      • Editorial board and staff
      • Contributors
    • Vision
  • Analysis
  • Opinion Pieces
    • EER Editorials
    • Contributors’ Opinions
  • Reports
  • Reading Radicalization
  • Events
    • EER Events
    • Events EER attends
  • Interviews
  • Videos
  • Contact
No Result
View All Result
European Eye on Radicalization
No Result
View All Result
Home Opinion Pieces EER Editorials

Big Tech and Terrorism – A British “Watershed” View

30 October 2018
in EER Editorials, Opinion Pieces
157
VIEWS
Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

European Eye on Radicalization

 

In Parliamentary testimony on 24 October, the top British counter-terrorism police officer Neil Basu painted a gloomy and alarming picture. Terror investigations had reached a record high of around 700, he said. Jihadis remain the biggest concern, making up around 80% of cases, but the far right threat is increasing and the two sides feed off each other. Basu fears the UK counter-terrorism machine does not match the danger it faces, even though it is running “red hot”.

There was one significant ray of light, though, in an area where many might not have expected to find one. Asked about social media and online extremism, Basu called it “the greatest threat”. But he went on to sound an optimistic note about technology companies in the aftermath of a string of terrorist attacks in the UK in 2017 that claimed 36 lives:

I am glad you’ve been specific about social media providers, because as I’ve said, that’s the greatest threat. So, if I’d been sitting here a year ago, or certainly 18 months ago, prior to the first attack [in Westminster in March 2017], I’d have probably been calling them out. The reality is that, you know, 2017 has been a shock and a watershed year for a lot of people, and I think that includes big tech.

The thinking and approach of the companies have changed, Basu continued:

I think they’ve recognized that it is no longer good enough to say “we’re platforms” when “we’re actually publishers” and the realize they have got to do something about it.

I am not sure they are as match fit to do something about it as we all thought they might have been. Were they putting enough resources, effort, people into this problem?  Not sure they were. I think they’re really stepping up.

We obviously have an ongoing relationship, the government has an ongoing relationship with them. When I say us, counter-terrorism policing and MI5. They are coming much more to the table and doing something about it.

…

None of the big players want any kind of criminal content on their platforms. They’ve been very clear about that. They’re trying to do more about it.

Nonetheless, the companies could try even harder:

My big plea to them is when you’re taking stuff down, and they are now starting to use automated artificial intelligence techniques to do that, is it’s OK spotting it and taking it down. But if you don’t read it and you don’t understand what it is and you don’t understand what the underlying threat is and you don’t report it to us, that’s a real gap in intelligence.

Basu cited his predecessor Mark Rowley to illustrate the gravity of this issue:

I think Mark reported to  this committee one in which bomb making instructions had quite rightly been spotted, flagged and taken down. But they hadn’t reported it. And it took several months for that to come to us due to a post-incident investigation.

Basu went on to describe what he called “utopia” – a situation where terrorist content is not uploaded in the first place:

Effectively anyone trying to upload won’t be able to upload because it hits lots of particular flags. But creating an algorithm for that is incredibly difficult.

Better profiling systems are needed, he added:

What they do need, and this is something we need as well, there isn’t a body of research in the same way that there is for serial murderers or pedophiles. So you’re looking at creating an algorithm that tells you what terrorist behavior is. We need better understanding of what the behavioral triggers would be, to create an algorithm for a company to be able to a) spot when somebody is reengaging or b) spot when stuff is going on.

And I’m not talking about the very obvious. There’s a lot of very obvious material that goes on that is very easy to spot and their robotics can take down. There’s a lot of other stuff that doesn’t quite get to that threshold. And I would like to see them taking extremism that doesn’t cross the criminal threshold seriously.

Smaller platforms are another problem:

Obviously we have lots of problems with much smaller platforms that are very difficult to engage with. But the big companies who have the biggest influence in this area, they have been cooperating.

Basu also revealed the scale and depth of the work of the counter-terrorist Internet Referral Unit:

[It] engaged with 300 companies since it was founded back in 2010. 308,000 pieces of terrorist ideology removed from the internet.  All of that has been done through voluntary co-operation with those 300 companies, of which the vast majority sit on the big platforms. So those big companies, effectively, they have listened when we’ve flagged stuff to them and they have taken stuff down.

Some in the committee room seemed slightly taken aback by Basu’s positive views, even though they were accompanied by important qualifications.

Indeed, one should keep in mind that he has an objective in his work with technology companies:

And actually continually calling them out in public, I’m not sure that’s the best way to get that cooperation long term.

Nonetheless, his positive views on the “watershed” do appear to be based on real progress. In a country facing serious and multiplying threats, this is reassuring.

Related Posts

The Escalating Israeli-Palestinian Conflict
EER Editorials

The Escalating Israeli-Palestinian Conflict

30 January 2023
Spotlight on Contemporary Antisemitism
Contributors’ Opinions

Spotlight on Contemporary Antisemitism

27 January 2023
Preventing and Countering Right-Wing Extremism: Current and Upcoming Challenges
Contributors’ Opinions

Preventing and Countering Right-Wing Extremism: Current and Upcoming Challenges

26 January 2023
Sweden’s Free Speech Debate and the Growing Far-Right Movement
EER Editorials

Sweden’s Free Speech Debate and the Growing Far-Right Movement

24 January 2023
The Taliban’s Repression of Women is Not Only a Problem for Afghanistan
EER Editorials

The Taliban’s Repression of Women is Not Only a Problem for Afghanistan

17 January 2023
The Islamic State and the Question of “Lone Wolves”
EER Editorials

The Islamic State and the Question of “Lone Wolves”

9 January 2023

Latest from Twitter

Popular

The Challenges of Combatting Extremist Financing in Germany

The Challenges of Combatting Extremist Financing in Germany

6 January 2023
The Myth of the Remote-Controlled Car Bomb

The Myth of the Remote-Controlled Car Bomb

16 September 2019

Taliban: Structure, Strategy, Agenda, and the International Terrorism Threat

7 October 2022
How a Swedish Agency Stopped Funding the Muslim Brotherhood

How a Swedish Agency Stopped Funding the Muslim Brotherhood

5 September 2022
Becoming Ansar Allah: How the Islamic Revolution Conquered Yemen

Becoming Ansar Allah: How the Islamic Revolution Conquered Yemen

24 March 2021
The Role of Online Communities in the Expansion of Far-Right Extremism

The Role of Online Communities in the Expansion of Far-Right Extremism

3 November 2022

© 2018 EER - Copyright © European Eye on Radicalization.

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • About Us
    • Who We Are
      • Editorial board and staff
      • Contributors
    • Vision
  • Analysis
  • Opinion Pieces
    • EER Editorials
    • Contributors’ Opinions
  • Reports
  • Reading Radicalization
  • Events
    • EER Events
    • Events EER attends
  • Interviews
  • Videos
  • Contact
  • عربي
  • Fr
  • Es

© 2018 EER - Copyright © European Eye on Radicalization.

This website uses cookies. By continuing to use this website you are giving consent to cookies being used. Visit our Privacy and Cookie Policy.