• عربي
  • Fr
  • Es
No Result
View All Result
European Eye on Radicalization
  • Home
  • About Us
    • Who We Are
      • Editorial board and staff
      • Contributors
    • Vision
  • Analysis
  • Opinion Pieces
    • EER Editorials
    • Contributors’ Opinions
  • Reports
  • Reading Radicalization
  • Events
    • EER Events
    • Events EER attends
  • Interviews
  • Videos
  • Contact
  • Home
  • About Us
    • Who We Are
      • Editorial board and staff
      • Contributors
    • Vision
  • Analysis
  • Opinion Pieces
    • EER Editorials
    • Contributors’ Opinions
  • Reports
  • Reading Radicalization
  • Events
    • EER Events
    • Events EER attends
  • Interviews
  • Videos
  • Contact
No Result
View All Result
European Eye on Radicalization
No Result
View All Result
Home Opinion Pieces Contributors’ Opinions

Amrita Bhinder: “A Step Towards Peace in Kashmir”

13 August 2019
in Contributors’ Opinions, Opinion Pieces
Amrita Bhinder: “A Step Towards Peace in Kashmir”
1,313
VIEWS
Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

Amrita Bhinder

Amrita Bhinder is a columnist for leading publications and a TV panelist. A lawyer with 15 years of experience in the legal arena ranging from Supreme Court, Tribunals to consultancy and corporate.

Amrita was the legal head for an American conglomerate when she decided to give up her 9 to 5 corporate job to take an active part in the change that India was undergoing. She forayed into politics and was the State’s Spokesperson for the Bhartiya Janata Yuva Morcha (BJYM), Chandigarh. Amrita is currently in the BJYM’s National Executive Team.

Article 370 of the Indian Constitution, a temporary provision that awarded “special status” to the state of Jammu and Kashmir (often simply known as Kashmir), had gone on for seventy years by the time the Indian government cancelled it last week, despite having outlived its purpose decades ago.

The Constituent Assembly of Jammu and Kashmir, which was a body of representatives elected in 1951, clearly stated within the Preamble to the Constitution of the state in 1956 that it was an integral part of the Union of India “in pursuance of the accession of this state to India which took place on the 26th day of October 1947.” But still Article 370 persisted, year after year, meaning the state was immune to national laws and victim to predatory local politicians, who transformed it a personal fiefdom. Meanwhile, separatist leaders ensured that the demand for azaadi (freedom) simmered endlessly.

All efforts to abrogate Article 370, and genuinely empower and integrate the state of Jammu and Kashmir into the Indian Union, were thwarted by autocratic local power-wielders who benefited from the frozen conflict, accruing power and wealth. Secularism is a central tenet of the Constitution of India, but the fact of a Muslim majority in Kashmir was used as a deterrent against majority-Hindu India absorbing the province properly. This not only kept alive the conflict; it ignored the significant minority populations in the area. Muslims dominate the Valley, but Jammu is predominantly Hindu, Ladakh is a mix of Buddhists and Muslims, and then there are the Gujjars and Bakarwals.

In 2018, for the first time, after over a decade of effort, the grassroots-level Kashmiri leaders got to take part in a democratic process: local body and municipal elections, under the Narendra Modi-led government, overseen by the Ministry of Home Affairs. The local body elections were, predictably, opposed by the states two biggest local political parties — the National Conference (NC) and the Jammu and Kashmir People’s Democratic Party (PDP). It is telling how two former Chief Ministers of the state that headed these parties, Mr. Omar Abdullah and Ms. Mehbooba Mufti, called for the cancellation of the process that would otherwise truly empower the people, a policy in-line with the demands of militants supported by Pakistan and the separatist leaders.

Local factors are, of course, important, yet without the cross-border propaganda from Pakistan, targeting the local Muslim population, it is impossible to imagine the Kashmir crisis proving as intractable as it has. The “special status” of Kashmir, designed to dampen tensions in the state, has proven a gift to Islamabad in its campaign of disinformation and incitement in Kashmir, using the religious card to fuel separatist and terrorist movements against India.

Article 370 provided a framework in which corruption, terrorism, alienation from the state could flourish in Kashmir. It kept alive — even propagated as an ideal — the notion of separatism. This cause was easily manipulated by extremists, local and foreign, to alienate the youth and use them as fodder to wage war against India. This dynamic was at play with the February 2019 Pulwama attack, where a suicide bomber in a car — a local Kashmiri, indoctrinated by foreign propaganda — rammed into a convoy of para-military forces, killing 44 personnel and triggering a round of escalation between India and Pakistan on the eve of an Election in India.

The sense of power nourished in Kashmir by the “special status” of Article 370 was a false one. This arrangement was an impediment to equal application of the Rule of Law and a hurdle for development. The abrogation of Article 370 clears the way for the state of Jammu and Kashmir to finally take its rightful place as a real, integrated part of India.

 

 

 

European Eye on Radicalization aims to publish a diversity of perspectives and as such does not endorse the opinions expressed by contributors. The views expressed in this article represent the author alone.

Related Posts

Facing the Challenge of Terrorists With Chemical Weapons
EER Editorials

Facing the Challenge of Terrorists With Chemical Weapons

16 March 2023
Sizing Up Sayf al-Adel, Al-Qaeda’s Alleged New Leader
EER Editorials

Sizing Up Sayf al-Adel, Al-Qaeda’s Alleged New Leader

9 March 2023
The Death of Ibrahim al-Qahtani and the Condition of the Islamic State
EER Editorials

The Death of Ibrahim al-Qahtani and the Condition of the Islamic State

2 March 2023
Paraguay Breaks Away From the Pro-Islamist Governments of Latin America
EER Editorials

Paraguay Breaks Away From the Pro-Islamist Governments of Latin America

26 February 2023
The Role of Humanitarian Aid in Combating Extremism and Preserving Human Rights
EER Editorials

The Role of Humanitarian Aid in Combating Extremism and Preserving Human Rights

25 February 2023
Designation and Moderation of Online Terrorist Content
Contributors’ Opinions

Designation and Moderation of Online Terrorist Content

21 February 2023

Latest from Twitter

Popular

Is Al-Qaeda Capable of Global Terrorism Any More?

Is Al-Qaeda Capable of Global Terrorism Any More?

23 February 2023
The History and Structure of Islamic Organizations in the United States

The History and Structure of Islamic Organizations in the United States

30 October 2020
The Challenges of Combatting Extremist Financing in Germany

The Challenges of Combatting Extremist Financing in Germany

6 January 2023
The Role of Online Communities in the Expansion of Far-Right Extremism

The Role of Online Communities in the Expansion of Far-Right Extremism

3 November 2022
Islamist Extremism and Jihadism in Latin America: A Longstanding and Underestimated Phenomenon (Part 1)

Islamist Extremism and Jihadism in Latin America: A Longstanding and Underestimated Phenomenon (Part 1)

14 April 2022

Taliban: Structure, Strategy, Agenda, and the International Terrorism Threat

7 October 2022

© 2018 EER - Copyright © European Eye on Radicalization.

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • About Us
    • Who We Are
      • Editorial board and staff
      • Contributors
    • Vision
  • Analysis
  • Opinion Pieces
    • EER Editorials
    • Contributors’ Opinions
  • Reports
  • Reading Radicalization
  • Events
    • EER Events
    • Events EER attends
  • Interviews
  • Videos
  • Contact
  • عربي
  • Fr
  • Es

© 2018 EER - Copyright © European Eye on Radicalization.

This website uses cookies. By continuing to use this website you are giving consent to cookies being used. Visit our Privacy and Cookie Policy.