• عربي
  • Fr
  • Es
No Result
View All Result
European Eye on Radicalization
  • Home
  • About Us
    • Who We Are
      • Editorial board and staff
      • Contributors
    • Vision
  • Analysis
  • Opinion Pieces
    • EER Editorials
    • Contributors’ Opinions
  • Reports
  • Reading Radicalization
  • Events
    • EER Events
    • Events EER attends
  • Interviews
  • Videos
  • Contact
  • Home
  • About Us
    • Who We Are
      • Editorial board and staff
      • Contributors
    • Vision
  • Analysis
  • Opinion Pieces
    • EER Editorials
    • Contributors’ Opinions
  • Reports
  • Reading Radicalization
  • Events
    • EER Events
    • Events EER attends
  • Interviews
  • Videos
  • Contact
No Result
View All Result
European Eye on Radicalization
No Result
View All Result
Home Reports

The Graveyard of Empires: The Causes and Consequences of American Withdrawal from Afghanistan

Oved Lobel

4 August 2021
in Reports
The Graveyard of Empires: The Causes and Consequences of American Withdrawal from Afghanistan
8,235
VIEWS
Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

This report is an attempt to revise the conventional understanding of the war in Afghanistan, the commentary on which is plagued by historical myths and misperceptions, analytical category errors, and resultant assumptions that have calcified into dogmas. The report also seeks to examine the consequences of American withdrawal.

The analytical problems stem from the very language used to describe the elements of the war, which in English and other Western languages is saturated with assumptions about identity, particularly nationality and ethnicity, that have little relevance in discussions of Islamist groups and the states in which they operate. It leads to the use of phrases like “the Afghan Taliban,” a designation akin to “the number red”. This mode of thinking leads to the arbitrary division of integrated, supranational networks into states and their “proxies,” when what is really being discussed is an ideological movement that happens to control some territories we think of as states. As a result, analysis becomes hopelessly skewed, ascribing local causes to events that are driven from outside by transnational Islamist actors. This is not a unique problem to Afghanistan: it is an issue covered in a previous EER report on Yemen. Afghanistan, however, is a particularly extreme case. The U.S. was only in Afghanistan to begin with because the proposition that the war was a local phenomenon that could be ignored crashed into the Twin Towers, Pentagon, and a field in Pennsylvania on September 11, 2001.

The clearest way to think about the situation is that there are three overlapping jihadist networks operating in Afghanistan: one attached to the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) that control Iran, one attached to the Inter-Services Intelligence (ISI) that control Pakistan, and the Khorasan “Province” of the Islamic State (ISKP) imported from Iraq and Syria. The IRGC and ISI networks in Afghanistan stretch back fifty years and have engaged in a complicated cooperative competition, as is set out in great detail. The crucial point is that, despite the popular belief that the Mujahideen were created with American help in the 1980s as a reaction to the Soviet occupation, the reality is the reverse: these networks, created a decade earlier by ISI and later joined by the IRGC, drew in the Soviets and then the Americans. The ISKP is the newest of these three jihadist trends and the fastest-growing, infiltrating and rapidly cannibalizing large sections of especially the ISI network.

Across multiple American administrations since 2009, a “new thinking” has taken hold, a deeply ideological view about the world and the U.S. role in it, unaffected by external considerations related to actual events, a philosophy encapsulated by the term “forever wars” and the opposition to them. It amounts to a belief that if the U.S. leaves a country, the problem is thereby solved or at least no longer of concern to U.S. interests—hence the refusal of the U.S. to reassess its Afghan withdrawal even as the evidence that the U.S. drawdown was creating a strategic and humanitarian disaster grew. The cold realist case for this drawdown is that U.S. resources are better devoted to great power competition rather than counterterrorism. As this report shows, this is a false dichotomy.

This report is not intended as a comprehensive history of Afghanistan, but as a step towards stripping away the mythology and misrepresentation that has disconnected almost all contemporary commentary of the conflict from reality.

DOWNLOAD THE FULL REPORT

 

European Eye on Radicalization aims to publish a diversity of perspectives and as such does not endorse the opinions expressed by contributors. The views expressed in this article represent the author alone.

Image credit: Aviva Childress. She can be found on Instagram. 

Related Posts

The Challenges of Combatting Extremist Financing in Germany
Reports

The Challenges of Combatting Extremist Financing in Germany

6 January 2023
The Role of Online Communities in the Expansion of Far-Right Extremism
Reports

The Role of Online Communities in the Expansion of Far-Right Extremism

3 November 2022
Reports

Taliban: Structure, Strategy, Agenda, and the International Terrorism Threat

7 October 2022
How a Swedish Agency Stopped Funding the Muslim Brotherhood
Reports

How a Swedish Agency Stopped Funding the Muslim Brotherhood

5 September 2022
The Iranian Information Revolution
Reports

The Iranian Information Revolution

20 July 2022
Islamist Extremism and Jihadism in Latin America: A Longstanding and Underestimated Phenomenon (Part 2)
Reports

Islamist Extremism and Jihadism in Latin America: A Longstanding and Underestimated Phenomenon (Part 2)

17 June 2022

Latest from Twitter

Popular

The Challenges of Combatting Extremist Financing in Germany

The Challenges of Combatting Extremist Financing in Germany

6 January 2023
The Myth of the Remote-Controlled Car Bomb

The Myth of the Remote-Controlled Car Bomb

16 September 2019

Taliban: Structure, Strategy, Agenda, and the International Terrorism Threat

7 October 2022
How a Swedish Agency Stopped Funding the Muslim Brotherhood

How a Swedish Agency Stopped Funding the Muslim Brotherhood

5 September 2022
Becoming Ansar Allah: How the Islamic Revolution Conquered Yemen

Becoming Ansar Allah: How the Islamic Revolution Conquered Yemen

24 March 2021
The Role of Online Communities in the Expansion of Far-Right Extremism

The Role of Online Communities in the Expansion of Far-Right Extremism

3 November 2022

© 2018 EER - Copyright © European Eye on Radicalization.

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • About Us
    • Who We Are
      • Editorial board and staff
      • Contributors
    • Vision
  • Analysis
  • Opinion Pieces
    • EER Editorials
    • Contributors’ Opinions
  • Reports
  • Reading Radicalization
  • Events
    • EER Events
    • Events EER attends
  • Interviews
  • Videos
  • Contact
  • عربي
  • Fr
  • Es

© 2018 EER - Copyright © European Eye on Radicalization.

This website uses cookies. By continuing to use this website you are giving consent to cookies being used. Visit our Privacy and Cookie Policy.